The Appropriateness of Humanitarian Response in the DPRK
Nazanin Zadeh-Cummings
Associate Director of Research at the Centre for Humanitarian Leadership at Deakin University
Between life-saving humanitarian aid and structural development work
Humanitarian aid carries connotations of emergency, urgent response, and
acute threats to human morbidity, mortality, and dignity. Despite the end of
the famine emergency since the mid-1990s, however, the DPRK has continued to receive international
humanitarian aid.This article argues that
while concepts of development and humanitarianism highlight the challenges to
bringing structural change in the DPRK, the long-term nature of need in the
DPRK does not signal an inappropriate match with humanitarian aid.In a sanctioned and
highly politicised environment with questions of denuclearisation and human
rights abuses, seeking to improve daily lives is an inherently structural act.
Without structural changes, acute needs have and likely will continue even in
times of non-emergency.